Cox-based MDR (CoxMDR) [37] U U U U U No No No No Yes D, Q, MV D D D D No Yes Yes Yes NoMultivariate GMDR (MVGMDR) [38] Robust MDR (RMDR) [39]Blood pressure [38] RG-7604 Bladder cancer [39] Alzheimer’s disease [40] Chronic Fatigue Syndrome [41]Log-linear-based MDR (LM-MDR) [40] Odds-ratio-based MDR (OR-MDR) [41] Optimal MDR (Opt-MDR) [42] U NoMDR for Stratified Populations (MDR-SP) [43] UDNoPair-wise MDR (PW-MDR) [44]Simultaneous handling of households and unrelateds Transformation of survival time into dichotomous attribute applying martingale residuals Multivariate modeling using generalized estimating equations Handling of sparse/empty cells MedChemExpress Fruquintinib employing `unknown risk’ class Improved aspect mixture by log-linear models and re-classification of threat OR rather of naive Bayes classifier to ?classify its danger Data driven rather of fixed threshold; Pvalues approximated by generalized EVD as an alternative of permutation test Accounting for population stratification by utilizing principal elements; significance estimation by generalized EVD Handling of sparse/empty cells by reducing contingency tables to all feasible two-dimensional interactions No D U No DYesKidney transplant [44]NoEvaluation from the classification result Extended MDR (EMDR) Evaluation of final model by v2 statistic; [45] consideration of distinct permutation tactics Distinctive phenotypes or data structures Survival Dimensionality Classification depending on variations beReduction (SDR) [46] tween cell and complete population survival estimates; IBS to evaluate modelsUNoSNoRheumatoid arthritis [46]continuedTable 1. (Continued) Data structure Cov Pheno Little sample sizesa No No ApplicationsNameDescriptionU U No QNoSBladder cancer [47] Renal and Vascular EndStage Disease [48] Obesity [49]Survival MDR (Surv-MDR) a0023781 [47] Quantitative MDR (QMDR) [48] U No O NoOrdinal MDR (Ord-MDR) [49] F No DLog-rank test to classify cells; squared log-rank statistic to evaluate models dar.12324 Handling of quantitative phenotypes by comparing cell with overall imply; t-test to evaluate models Handling of phenotypes with >2 classes by assigning every single cell to probably phenotypic class Handling of extended pedigrees employing pedigree disequilibrium test No F No D NoAlzheimer’s disease [50]MDR with Pedigree Disequilibrium Test (MDR-PDT) [50] MDR with Phenomic Analysis (MDRPhenomics) [51]Autism [51]Aggregated MDR (A-MDR) [52]UNoDNoJuvenile idiopathic arthritis [52]Model-based MDR (MBMDR) [53]Handling of trios by comparing quantity of times genotype is transmitted versus not transmitted to affected kid; analysis of variance model to assesses effect of Pc Defining important models applying threshold maximizing region below ROC curve; aggregated threat score according to all considerable models Test of every cell versus all other folks using association test statistic; association test statistic comparing pooled highrisk and pooled low-risk cells to evaluate models U NoD, Q, SNoBladder cancer [53, 54], Crohn’s illness [55, 56], blood pressure [57]Cov ?Covariate adjustment feasible, Pheno ?Feasible phenotypes with D ?Dichotomous, Q ?Quantitative, S ?Survival, MV ?Multivariate, O ?Ordinal.Information structures: F ?Family primarily based, U ?Unrelated samples.A roadmap to multifactor dimensionality reduction methodsaBasically, MDR-based strategies are created for smaller sample sizes, but some approaches present special approaches to cope with sparse or empty cells, generally arising when analyzing quite smaller sample sizes.||Gola et al.Table 2. Implementations of MDR-based methods Metho.Cox-based MDR (CoxMDR) [37] U U U U U No No No No Yes D, Q, MV D D D D No Yes Yes Yes NoMultivariate GMDR (MVGMDR) [38] Robust MDR (RMDR) [39]Blood pressure [38] Bladder cancer [39] Alzheimer’s illness [40] Chronic Fatigue Syndrome [41]Log-linear-based MDR (LM-MDR) [40] Odds-ratio-based MDR (OR-MDR) [41] Optimal MDR (Opt-MDR) [42] U NoMDR for Stratified Populations (MDR-SP) [43] UDNoPair-wise MDR (PW-MDR) [44]Simultaneous handling of households and unrelateds Transformation of survival time into dichotomous attribute making use of martingale residuals Multivariate modeling making use of generalized estimating equations Handling of sparse/empty cells using `unknown risk’ class Improved element mixture by log-linear models and re-classification of risk OR as an alternative of naive Bayes classifier to ?classify its risk Information driven instead of fixed threshold; Pvalues approximated by generalized EVD rather of permutation test Accounting for population stratification by utilizing principal components; significance estimation by generalized EVD Handling of sparse/empty cells by decreasing contingency tables to all feasible two-dimensional interactions No D U No DYesKidney transplant [44]NoEvaluation on the classification outcome Extended MDR (EMDR) Evaluation of final model by v2 statistic; [45] consideration of distinctive permutation approaches Distinctive phenotypes or data structures Survival Dimensionality Classification determined by differences beReduction (SDR) [46] tween cell and entire population survival estimates; IBS to evaluate modelsUNoSNoRheumatoid arthritis [46]continuedTable 1. (Continued) Data structure Cov Pheno Compact sample sizesa No No ApplicationsNameDescriptionU U No QNoSBladder cancer [47] Renal and Vascular EndStage Illness [48] Obesity [49]Survival MDR (Surv-MDR) a0023781 [47] Quantitative MDR (QMDR) [48] U No O NoOrdinal MDR (Ord-MDR) [49] F No DLog-rank test to classify cells; squared log-rank statistic to evaluate models dar.12324 Handling of quantitative phenotypes by comparing cell with overall imply; t-test to evaluate models Handling of phenotypes with >2 classes by assigning each cell to probably phenotypic class Handling of extended pedigrees using pedigree disequilibrium test No F No D NoAlzheimer’s illness [50]MDR with Pedigree Disequilibrium Test (MDR-PDT) [50] MDR with Phenomic Evaluation (MDRPhenomics) [51]Autism [51]Aggregated MDR (A-MDR) [52]UNoDNoJuvenile idiopathic arthritis [52]Model-based MDR (MBMDR) [53]Handling of trios by comparing number of occasions genotype is transmitted versus not transmitted to affected youngster; evaluation of variance model to assesses impact of Computer Defining considerable models making use of threshold maximizing area below ROC curve; aggregated risk score depending on all substantial models Test of each and every cell versus all other individuals working with association test statistic; association test statistic comparing pooled highrisk and pooled low-risk cells to evaluate models U NoD, Q, SNoBladder cancer [53, 54], Crohn’s illness [55, 56], blood pressure [57]Cov ?Covariate adjustment attainable, Pheno ?Feasible phenotypes with D ?Dichotomous, Q ?Quantitative, S ?Survival, MV ?Multivariate, O ?Ordinal.Information structures: F ?Household primarily based, U ?Unrelated samples.A roadmap to multifactor dimensionality reduction methodsaBasically, MDR-based solutions are made for modest sample sizes, but some solutions provide particular approaches to handle sparse or empty cells, normally arising when analyzing extremely smaller sample sizes.||Gola et al.Table 2. Implementations of MDR-based strategies Metho.