Acceptances of LY2510924 supplement ordinary favorable roles and total SPQ scores. This was the case (Fisher Z-transform, P = 0.002). This was also observed for the disorganization factor (Fisher Z-transform, P = 0.003), the delusionlike-ideation factor (Fisher Z-transform, P = 0.005) and the interpersonal one (Fisher Z-transform, P = 0.018). The specificity for extraordinary versus ordinary roles was further demonstrated by the presence of significant differences between the two following correlation coefficients: the one for acceptances of extraordinary unfavorable roles and the total SPQ scores, and the one for acceptances of ordinary unfavorable roles and the total SPQ scores (Fisher Z-transform, P = 0.014). No such differences were observed for the total PDI correlation coefficients and for the PDI subscales’ correlation coefficients. Regardless of their favorability, the higher the SPQ score, the greater the number of extraordinary roles that were accepted (see Figures 1b and d). A multiple regression analysis was performed toPublished in partnership with the Schizophrenia International Research SocietyExtraordinary roles and schizotypy AL Fernandez-Cruz et al3 explore whether percentages of accepted roles for each category combination could complement each other in predicting total SPQ scores and/or whether some conditions would render others insignificant. A significant regression equation was found (F (4, 202) = 11.57, P = 2E – 08), with an R2 of 0.189. The standardized -coefficients were as follows: positive for extraordinary unfavorable ( = 0.280, P = 0.026), for extraordinary favorable ( = 0.238, P = 0.047), and for ordinary unfavorable roles ( = 0.071, P = 0.511), and negative for ordinary favorable roles ( = 0.212, P = 0.041). The same regression analysis was performed to predict disorganization. It was significant (F(4, 202) = 10.14, P = 1.7E – 7), with an R2 of 0.170. The standardized -coefficient were as follows, positive for extraordinary unfavorable ( = 0.259, P = 0.042), for extraordinary favorable ( = 0.226, P = 0.063), and for ordinary unfavorable roles ( = 0.095, P = 0.386), and again negative for ordinary favorable roles ( = – 0.235, P = 0.026). The percentages of social roles accepted in each category combination for each of the two SPQ subject-subgroups are shown in Figure 2. The results of the repeated-measures analysis of variance (ANOVA) revealed that ordinary and favorable roles, independently, were more often accepted than their counterparts (F(1, 201) = 435.78, P{0.000001) and (F(1, 201) = 582.84, P{0.000001), respectively. Also, there was an ordinariness ?SPQ group interaction (F(1, 201) = 5.44, P = 0.021) but no three-way interaction was observed. In general, across all categories, individuals with high SPQ scores accepted more social roles than those with low SPQ scores (F(1, 201) = 18.95, P = 0.000013; see Figure 2). Reaction times Mean reaction times are shown in Figure 3 High accepters of extraordinary roles appeared faster at accepting all roles (M = 1038, s.d. = 258) and slower at rejecting them (M = 1,084, s.d. = 303) than low accepters (M = 1,099, s.d. = 299) and (M = 992, s.d. = 257), respectively. The mixed-model ANOVA revealed that this acceptance ?subgroup interaction was significant (F(1, 163) = 55.56, P = 5E – 12). Post hoc MK-571 (sodium salt) web analyses using independent samples t-tests showed that high accepters were significantly slower at rejecting extraordinary favorable and unfavorable roles than low accepters, (t(177) = – 3.Acceptances of ordinary favorable roles and total SPQ scores. This was the case (Fisher Z-transform, P = 0.002). This was also observed for the disorganization factor (Fisher Z-transform, P = 0.003), the delusionlike-ideation factor (Fisher Z-transform, P = 0.005) and the interpersonal one (Fisher Z-transform, P = 0.018). The specificity for extraordinary versus ordinary roles was further demonstrated by the presence of significant differences between the two following correlation coefficients: the one for acceptances of extraordinary unfavorable roles and the total SPQ scores, and the one for acceptances of ordinary unfavorable roles and the total SPQ scores (Fisher Z-transform, P = 0.014). No such differences were observed for the total PDI correlation coefficients and for the PDI subscales’ correlation coefficients. Regardless of their favorability, the higher the SPQ score, the greater the number of extraordinary roles that were accepted (see Figures 1b and d). A multiple regression analysis was performed toPublished in partnership with the Schizophrenia International Research SocietyExtraordinary roles and schizotypy AL Fernandez-Cruz et al3 explore whether percentages of accepted roles for each category combination could complement each other in predicting total SPQ scores and/or whether some conditions would render others insignificant. A significant regression equation was found (F (4, 202) = 11.57, P = 2E – 08), with an R2 of 0.189. The standardized -coefficients were as follows: positive for extraordinary unfavorable ( = 0.280, P = 0.026), for extraordinary favorable ( = 0.238, P = 0.047), and for ordinary unfavorable roles ( = 0.071, P = 0.511), and negative for ordinary favorable roles ( = 0.212, P = 0.041). The same regression analysis was performed to predict disorganization. It was significant (F(4, 202) = 10.14, P = 1.7E – 7), with an R2 of 0.170. The standardized -coefficient were as follows, positive for extraordinary unfavorable ( = 0.259, P = 0.042), for extraordinary favorable ( = 0.226, P = 0.063), and for ordinary unfavorable roles ( = 0.095, P = 0.386), and again negative for ordinary favorable roles ( = – 0.235, P = 0.026). The percentages of social roles accepted in each category combination for each of the two SPQ subject-subgroups are shown in Figure 2. The results of the repeated-measures analysis of variance (ANOVA) revealed that ordinary and favorable roles, independently, were more often accepted than their counterparts (F(1, 201) = 435.78, P{0.000001) and (F(1, 201) = 582.84, P{0.000001), respectively. Also, there was an ordinariness ?SPQ group interaction (F(1, 201) = 5.44, P = 0.021) but no three-way interaction was observed. In general, across all categories, individuals with high SPQ scores accepted more social roles than those with low SPQ scores (F(1, 201) = 18.95, P = 0.000013; see Figure 2). Reaction times Mean reaction times are shown in Figure 3 High accepters of extraordinary roles appeared faster at accepting all roles (M = 1038, s.d. = 258) and slower at rejecting them (M = 1,084, s.d. = 303) than low accepters (M = 1,099, s.d. = 299) and (M = 992, s.d. = 257), respectively. The mixed-model ANOVA revealed that this acceptance ?subgroup interaction was significant (F(1, 163) = 55.56, P = 5E – 12). Post hoc analyses using independent samples t-tests showed that high accepters were significantly slower at rejecting extraordinary favorable and unfavorable roles than low accepters, (t(177) = – 3.