Ubject in the end of the experiment session. Situation 3 (females 37; males
Ubject in the end in the experiment session. Situation 3 (females 37; males 27) was the Winnertakeall situation. This situation was identical for the Baseline except the subjects have been randomly and anonymously placed into groups of four through the pc and then told that the topic within the group that performs ideal around the RMET will receive 40 and all other folks in that group receive 0 (a random draw determines winner in case of tie). The 40 was selected to roughly equalize the monetary earnings across circumstances 2; average earnings have been approximately 0 per person within the Individual situation, as a result generating a prize of 40 akin for the winner receiving the earnings for everyone within the group. Situation 4 (females 26; males 26) was the Charity situation. Just before undertaking the RMET, the topic was told that she or he would undertake a process for a charity of her selection, using the amount donated anonymously around the subject’s behalf for the charity based on their functionality on the task. The topic was then given a list of 4 order SMER28 charities (Amnesty International, UNICEF, Physicians without Borders, and American Cancer Society) and provided having a paragraph about that organization’s mission in addition to a picture of an instance of a beneficiary of that organization. The text and photos have been meant to serve two purposes: to enable the topic to produce an informed decision when deciding the charity to receive the earnings, and to prime an outward, otherregarding orientation. The topic next selected which charity will receive hisPLOS 1 DOI:0.37journal.pone.043973 December 3,5 Dollars Affects Theory of Mind Differently by GenderTable . Predicted average therapy impact on RMET score relative to baseline situation. (A) Intrinsic motivation Individual (2) Winnertakeall (3) Charity Female Male Female Male Female Male 0 0 0 0 (B) Extrinsic motivation (C) Social orientation (D) Overall genderspecific impact (E) All round combined effectColumns AC separate the distinct channels by which money is predicted to affect overall engagement. Symbols indicate the path and magnitude direction of predicted impact: “” indicates significant positive effect, “” indicates compact constructive effect, “0” indicates tiny to no effect, “” indicates an unclear or no impact, “” indicates a tiny adverse impact, “” indicates a sizable negative, and “” indicates an incredibly big negative impact. Genderspecific treatment effects are predicted in motivation but not orientation. Huge gender differences in the Person and Winnertakeall situations (column D) are obscured when males and females are combined (column E). doi:0.37journal.pone.043973.tor her earnings and after that completed the RMET with 0.40 per right query donated to the chosen charity. All other aspects of this situation were exactly the same as in the Baseline. Payment earnings were distributed for the selected charities following the completion on the experiment. Table offers a summary of our predictions for each and every situation relative towards the Baseline. The ” and ” inside the table indicate our predicted directional average effect, with far more symbols indicating a bigger impact. An unclear average impact is indicated by ”. The monetary incentive within the Person condition must: lower intrinsic motivation on average for females but have tiny to no effect on males on average (column 
A); improve both males’ and females’ PubMed ID:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22268601 extrinsic motivation (column B), using the effect bigger for males; and reduce social orientation major individuals.